AMS 700 Penile Implant MRI Safety: 7 Rules Every Patient Should Know in 2026
AMS 700 penile implant MRI safety explained: 1.5T and 3T conditions, Coloplast Titan MRI rules, implant cards and what MR Conditional means.

- AMS 700 penile implant MRI safety is manufacturer-documented: the AMS 700 family is MR Conditional at 1.5T and 3T when Boston Scientific's specified scanning conditions are followed.
- MR Conditional does not mean unrestricted MRI safety; scanner strength, spatial gradient, SAR and other manufacturer conditions must be checked before scanning.
- Coloplast Titan and Titan Touch are also MR Conditional, with Coloplast documentation specifying MRI conditions up to 3T rather than an unrestricted “MRI safe” classification.
- Patients should keep and present their penile implant identification card because the MRI team needs the exact manufacturer and model—not simply the fact that a penile implant is present.
- Most modern penile prostheses can undergo MRI under their specified conditions, but obsolete OmniPhase and DuraPhase implants are important historical exceptions and an unknown implant should never simply be assumed safe.
AMS 700 penile implant MRI safety is generally reassuring: Boston Scientific classifies the AMS 700 family as MR Conditional for both 1.5-tesla and 3-tesla MRI when the manufacturer’s specified scanning conditions are followed. Coloplast Titan and several other modern penile prostheses are also MR Conditional. However, “MR Conditional” does not mean that every MRI scanner, sequence or setting is automatically acceptable.
That distinction is the most important thing to understand.
Many men with a penile implant eventually need an MRI for something completely unrelated to erectile dysfunction.
It may be an MRI of the:
brain;
spine;
knee;
shoulder;
heart;
prostate region;
abdomen;
or pelvis.
The first question is often:
“Can I have an MRI with a penile implant?”
For most men with a modern, correctly identified penile prosthesis, the answer is yes—under the conditions specified for that exact device.
A 2012 review of penile prosthesis MRI compatibility found no published clinical reports of an MRI complication in men with a penile prosthesis among the cases reviewed. More recent radiology literature continues to describe MRI as useful—and often particularly valuable—for assessing prosthesis position and complications.
But this does not mean the correct screening question is:
“Do penile implants work in MRI?”
The correct question is:
“What exact penile implant do I have, what is its MR classification, and what conditions did the manufacturer specify?”
The FDA advises that patients with implanted medical devices should not undergo MRI until the device has been positively identified as MR Safe or MR Conditional. If its MRI status is unknown, it should not simply be assumed safe.
For someone with a penile prosthesis, this makes the small implant card received after surgery surprisingly important.
It may save considerable time years later when an MRI is needed urgently.
What Does “MR Conditional” Actually Mean?
Before discussing individual penile implant models, it is important to understand the terminology.
MRI uses powerful magnetic fields, changing gradient fields and radiofrequency energy.
Implanted medical devices are therefore classified according to how they behave in that environment.
The American College of Radiology uses three standard categories:
MR Safe
MR Conditional
and
MR Unsafe.
An MR Safe object does not pose a known hazard in any MR environment.
An MR Unsafe object presents an unacceptable risk in the MR environment.
An MR Conditional device can be used safely only when defined conditions are satisfied.
Most modern penile prostheses that contain metallic components belong to the third category.
They are MR Conditional.
That is very different from saying:
“MRI compatible, no restrictions.”
Why the conditions matter
Manufacturer MRI instructions can specify factors such as:
magnet strength;
maximum spatial gradient;
specific absorption rate, or SAR;
scanner operating mode;
and maximum scanning duration under a particular energy exposure.
The MRI technologist or radiologist needs those specifications because MRI safety is determined by the combination of the implanted device and the MRI environment.
A device tested safely at 3 tesla under one SAR limit should not automatically be assumed safe under any possible 3-tesla protocol.
This is why the implant card or manufacturer MRI document is more useful than simply telling the radiographer:
“I have an American penile implant.”
Rule 1: Know the Exact Penile Implant You Have
This may sound obvious.
In practice, many patients do not know.
A man may remember being told he received:
“an American implant,”
“a three-piece implant,”
“AMS,”
“Coloplast,”
or
“a hydraulic prosthesis.”
Those descriptions are not precise enough for MRI screening.
Boston Scientific alone has marketed several penile prosthesis systems, including:
AMS 700;
AMS Ambicor;
Tactra;
and earlier Spectra configurations.
Coloplast has Titan, Titan Touch and Genesis devices among its penile prosthesis family.
Rigicon manufactures inflatable and malleable systems including Infla10 and Rigi10.
Different devices can contain different materials and have different MRI conditions.
What information should you keep?
The ideal record includes:
manufacturer;
exact model;
date of implantation;
hospital;
surgeon;
and device identification information supplied after surgery.
The operative report can also help if the card is lost.
What if you know only the manufacturer?
That is useful, but it may not be enough.
For example:
Boston Scientific penile implant MRI safety differs according to model.
Boston Scientific publishes a dedicated MRI guide covering its penile prostheses and provides model-specific implant cards. The company’s patient resource center specifically includes MRI documentation and identification cards for AMS 700, AMS Ambicor, Spectra and Tactra devices.
The MRI department should identify the exact implant rather than infer its safety status solely from manufacturer name.
Rule 2: AMS 700 Is MR Conditional—Not Unrestricted “MRI Safe”
This is the key section for the primary keyword.
AMS 700 penile implant MRI safety at 1.5T and 3T
Boston Scientific’s current MRI safety documentation classifies the AMS 700 inflatable penile prosthesis product line as MR Conditional.
Its non-clinical testing states that AMS 700 devices can be scanned under specified conditions at both:
1.5 Tesla
and
3.0 Tesla.
For the AMS 700 and AMS Ambicor product lines, Boston Scientific’s published conditions include:
MRI condition | 1.5 Tesla | 3.0 Tesla |
|---|---|---|
Static magnetic field | 1.5 T | 3.0 T |
Maximum spatial gradient in cited testing | 450 gauss/cm | 720 gauss/cm |
Maximum whole-body averaged SAR | 1.5 W/kg | 2.9 W/kg |
Scan duration used for SAR condition | 15 minutes | 15 minutes |
Highest reported temperature change in testing | ≤0.4°C | ≤1.9°C |
These are manufacturer test conditions—not instructions for patients to program into an MRI machine themselves.
The MRI department should verify the current manufacturer document associated with the patient's exact device.
What about AMS 700 LGX, CX and CXR?
LGX, CX and CXR are cylinder configurations within the AMS 700 family.
Boston Scientific’s MRI documentation refers to the AMS 700 product line, rather than treating LGX, CX and CXR as three unrelated MRI classifications.
That said, the MRI technologist should still verify the actual implanted system and current labeling.
The patient should not tell the radiology department:
“ChatGPT says my LGX is fine.”
The correct process is:
identify device → check manufacturer documentation → verify scanner conditions → scan according to radiology protocol.
That is the safe workflow.
Rule 3: Coloplast Titan Is Also MR Conditional, but Its Conditions Are Not Identical to AMS 700
Patients frequently compare Coloplast penile implant MRI safety with AMS.
The answer is reassuring for Titan.
Current Coloplast information classifies the Titan inflatable penile prosthesis as MRI conditional.
Coloplast’s MRI compatibility memorandum states that Titan and several other Coloplast penile prostheses were tested as MR Conditional under conditions including:
static magnetic field of 3 Tesla or less;
spatial gradient field of 720 gauss/cm or less;
and
maximum whole-body averaged SAR of 3 W/kg for 15 minutes.
The manufacturer reported temperature rises below 1.9°C under the cited 3T non-clinical testing conditions.
Notice something important.
The broad conclusion is similar:
both AMS 700 and Titan can undergo MRI under specified conditions.
But the precise technical numbers are not identical.
That is why a radiology department should not use an AMS 700 MRI sheet for a Titan patient—or vice versa.
Titan Touch
Titan Touch is part of the Titan inflatable family.
Current Coloplast materials describe Titan and Titan Touch as inflatable systems composed of two Bioflex cylinders, a pump and reservoir. Coloplast identifies Titan systems as MRI conditional.
Again, the safest approach remains to bring the exact device card.
Rule 4: “3 Tesla Compatible” Does Not Mean “Any 3 Tesla Scan Is Automatically Fine”
This is one of the most common misunderstandings.
A patient may read:
“MRI Conditional up to 3T.”
He then assumes:
“If the scanner says 3T, I can just go in.”
That is incomplete.
Magnetic field strength is only one parameter.
MRI safety conditions may also specify:
spatial gradient;
radiofrequency energy;
whole-body averaged SAR;
operating mode;
and exposure time.
The FDA specifically explains that an MR Conditional device may only be used when the MRI environment matches the conditions established in the device labeling.
This is why the phrase “MR Conditional” is more accurate than “MRI compatible.”
“Compatible” sounds absolute.
“Conditional” reminds the radiology team that parameters matter.
What is SAR?
SAR stands for specific absorption rate.
It is a measure related to the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue during MRI.
One concern with metallic or conductive implanted devices is heating.
The manufacturer therefore tests devices at specified SAR limits and reports expected heating under those conditions.
A penile prosthesis does not contain a battery like a pacemaker.
But components may still contain materials that can interact with the MR environment.
The MRI protocol must therefore stay within the tested conditions.
Do patients need to understand SAR mathematics?
No.
The patient’s job is not to calculate SAR.
The patient’s job is to provide accurate implant information.
The radiology department’s job is to determine whether the scan can be performed under the manufacturer’s conditions.
Rule 5: Always Tell the MRI Department About the Penile Prosthesis
A penile implant is completely internal.
That can make patients forget to mention it.
Some may think:
“It is nowhere near my brain MRI.”
Or:
“The MRI is for my knee, so the implant does not matter.”
That is the wrong approach.
The FDA advises patients to disclose all implanted medical devices during MRI screening.
Even if the body part being scanned is far from the penis, the device remains inside the MR environment.
The MRI staff need to confirm its status.
What should you say?
A useful statement is:
“I have a penile prosthesis. The manufacturer is Boston Scientific/Coloplast/Rigicon, and the model is [exact model]. Here is my implant card.”
That gives the MRI team something they can verify.
Saying:
“I have a pump”
is much less useful because many different implanted pumps exist.
What if the receptionist says penile implants are fine?
The patient should still disclose the device during formal MR screening.
Administrative reassurance is not the same as device verification by MRI personnel.
The ACR emphasizes that MR personnel should review manufacturer information and conditions when dealing with implanted medical devices.
Rule 6: Keep Your Penile Implant Card for Life
A penile implant card may seem unimportant after recovery.
The patient knows he has a prosthesis.
The surgeon knows what was implanted.
Why carry a card?
Because ten years later the circumstances may be completely different.
The implanting surgeon may have retired.
The patient may live in another country.
The original hospital may have changed systems.
The MRI may be required urgently.
The patient may remember the brand but not the exact model.
That little card can solve the identification problem quickly.
Boston Scientific makes individual implant identification cards available for its penile prosthesis systems and provides MRI guidance specifically for patients and radiology teams.
Coloplast similarly tells Titan recipients that they receive a Patient Implant Card identifying the device and its MR Conditional status.
Rigicon also advises patients with Infla10 systems to carry the Patient Identification Card containing MRI safety information.
What if the card is lost?
Do not invent the model.
Try to obtain:
the operative report;
hospital implant record;
manufacturer sticker record;
surgeon documentation;
or replacement device information.
A photograph of the original implant card saved securely in your personal medical records can also be useful.
The original documentation remains preferable when available.
Rule 7: If the Device Cannot Be Identified, Do Not Guess
This is especially important in older patients.
A man may have received a penile prosthesis:
15 years ago;
20 years ago;
or even several decades ago.
He may say:
“I think it was AMS.”
Or:
“It was a bendable implant.”
That is not enough information to declare MRI safe.
The FDA advises that an implanted device with unknown MRI safety status should not simply be treated as safe.
The radiology service should attempt to identify it.
Why old implants deserve extra attention
Most modern penile prostheses have reassuring MR testing.
But historical devices include important exceptions.
The best-known examples are the Dacomed OmniPhase and DuraPhase malleable prostheses.
These older devices demonstrated significant ferromagnetic interaction during testing.
Modern radiology literature continues to identify OmniPhase and DuraPhase as exceptions when discussing otherwise favorable penile-prosthesis MRI safety.
They are obsolete and no longer commercially available.
That makes them uncommon today.
But a man who received a prosthesis many decades ago could theoretically still have one.
Therefore:
old + unknown is not the same as modern + documented.
Are Modern Penile Implants Generally Safe in MRI?
The overall evidence is reassuring.
In the 2012 review by Lowe, Smith and Costabile, the researchers examined published clinical reports, in-vitro testing, radiology references and manufacturer information.
They found no reported MRI complication in the reviewed clinical articles involving men with penile prostheses.
Their conclusion included an important sentence:
“Prior prosthesis implantation should not preclude patients from having an MRI.”
— Lowe, Smith & Costabile, The Journal of Sexual Medicine.
That is a useful expert statement.
But it should not be shortened to:
“All penile implants are MRI safe.”
The authors themselves discussed model-specific exceptions and MRI conditions.
More recent radiology literature is similarly positive.
A 2021 RadioGraphics review described MRI as the preferred method for many suspected penile-prosthesis complications and stated that 1.5T and 3T imaging can be performed for most prostheses, while identifying obsolete OmniPhase and DuraPhase devices as exceptions.
A 2026 European Journal of Radiology review likewise describes MRI as an important modality for evaluating modern penile prostheses and their complications.
So the contemporary message is:
Having a penile implant usually does not mean losing future access to MRI.
But the device must still be correctly identified and scanned according to its conditions.
AMS 700 Penile Implant MRI Safety: What Should the Radiographer Know?
For an AMS 700 patient, the ideal workflow is straightforward.
The MRI department should know:
that the patient has a penile prosthesis;
the manufacturer is Boston Scientific;
the device belongs to the AMS 700 family;
the exact model information where available;
and the implantation details from the patient card.
Boston Scientific’s MRI documentation can then be reviewed.
The company identifies AMS 700 and AMS Ambicor as MR Conditional at 1.5T and 3T under defined spatial-gradient, SAR and scan-duration conditions.
Does the pump need to be inflated or deflated?
For an ordinary MRI performed for another medical reason, the patient should not independently alter the implant merely because he is going into an MRI scanner.
Follow the instructions from the MRI department and manufacturer documentation.
For dedicated MRI evaluation of prosthesis function, radiologists may sometimes obtain images in different prosthesis states.
Published imaging research describes MRI evaluation with cylinders in flaccid and inflated configurations when assessing certain complications.
That is a diagnostic protocol performed by medical professionals.
It is not a patient self-preparation rule for every MRI.
Does an AMS 700 Heat Up During MRI?
Heating is one of the potential MRI concerns for implanted devices.
That is why Boston Scientific performed non-clinical heating tests.
For AMS 700/AMS Ambicor, the manufacturer reported temperature changes under the specified 15-minute testing conditions of:
≤0.4°C at 1.5T
and
≤1.9°C at 3T.
Those results support the MR Conditional labeling.
They should not be interpreted as:
“My implant will always heat exactly 1.9°C.”
The values come from specific non-clinical test environments and conditions.
The clinical MRI team should follow the actual manufacturer limits rather than extrapolate beyond them.
Will an AMS 700 Move Inside the MRI Scanner?
Another theoretical concern is magnetic force or torque.
Modern penile prostheses are designed and tested so that, within their MR Conditional limits, the magnetic environment should not produce a hazardous interaction.
That is part of what MR Conditional testing evaluates.
The much more important historical concern involved older ferromagnetic devices such as OmniPhase and DuraPhase.
Those models showed considerably stronger magnetic interaction than contemporary prostheses.
A modern AMS 700 should therefore not be compared with those obsolete devices.
Can MRI Damage the AMS 700 Pump?
Within the manufacturer-specified MR Conditional environment, the device is designed to be scanned without producing an unacceptable hazard.
There is no battery or electronic controller inside an AMS 700.
It operates hydraulically.
The MRI safety issue is therefore different from the concerns associated with electrically active devices such as pacemakers.
That does not make screening unnecessary.
Passive implants containing metal are still assessed for:
magnetic forces;
heating;
and image artifact.
The ACR notes that passive implanted devices with metallic components are generally classified as MR Conditional or MR Unsafe rather than automatically MR Safe.
What About AMS Ambicor MRI Safety?
The AMS Ambicor is a two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis.
Boston Scientific’s current MRI safety document groups AMS 700 and AMS Ambicor together for the published MRI test conditions.
Both are described as MR Conditional under the specified 1.5T and 3T limits.
This is useful for men who have Ambicor and assume that MRI information about AMS 700 does not apply to them.
Still, the patient should present the Ambicor identification card rather than relying on an online article.
What About Boston Scientific Tactra MRI Safety?
Tactra is different because it is a malleable penile prosthesis, not an inflatable system.
It uses dual silicone layers around a Nitinol core.
Boston Scientific classifies Tactra as MR Conditional.
The manufacturer’s current MRI documentation specifies scanning at:
1.5T and 3.0T only,
with a maximum spatial gradient of 13,000 G/cm and theoretically estimated maximum whole-body averaged SAR of 2 W/kg in Normal Operating Mode.
In non-clinical testing, the reported RF-related maximum temperature increases after 15 minutes were approximately:
1.1°C at 1.5T
and
0.6°C at 3T.
Again, these details belong to the MRI team.
For the patient, the essential action is:
bring the Tactra implant card and disclose the device.
Coloplast Penile Implant MRI Safety: Titan and Titan Touch
The Titan family is also reassuring.
Coloplast states that Titan is MRI conditional and latex-free.
Its manufacturer MRI memorandum lists conditions including:
3T or less static field;
720 gauss/cm or less spatial gradient;
and
3 W/kg whole-body averaged SAR for 15 minutes.
Coloplast reported less than 1.9°C temperature rise in its specified 3T non-clinical testing.
The company also warns that image quality can be affected when the area being studied is close to the prosthesis.
That brings us to an important issue that is separate from safety.
MRI Safety and MRI Image Quality Are Not the Same Thing
An implant can be safe to scan and still make part of the image harder to interpret.
This is called artifact.
Metallic or other implanted materials can distort the local magnetic field and produce:
signal loss;
distortion;
or other changes near the device.
Boston Scientific’s AMS 700 MRI documentation notes that the prosthesis may compromise MRI image quality when the area of interest is close to the implant and that imaging parameters may need optimization.
Coloplast makes a similar observation in its MRI compatibility documentation.
Does this matter for a brain MRI?
Usually the penile prosthesis is physically very far from the brain.
The local artifact produced around the pelvic prosthesis should not be expected to obscure the brain.
What about a pelvic MRI?
That is where artifact becomes much more relevant.
The cylinders, pump, reservoir or tubing can affect nearby imaging.
A radiologist familiar with penile prostheses may adjust sequences and interpret the expected appearance.
In fact, MRI can be deliberately used to examine the prosthesis and surrounding anatomy.
MRI Can Be Used to Diagnose Penile Implant Problems
This surprises many patients.
They assume the implant is something radiologists try to avoid.
In reality, MRI can be one of the best imaging tools when there is uncertainty about a prosthesis problem.
A 2021 radiology review described MRI as particularly useful for assessing:
component position;
fluid leakage;
cylinder fracture;
aneurysmal cylinder change;
erosion;
crossover;
buckling;
and other mechanical or anatomical complications.
The new 2026 pictorial review goes even further.
It describes MRI appearances of:
cylinders;
pump;
reservoir;
tubing;
mechanical failure;
malposition;
erosion;
infection;
and floppy-glans-related abnormalities.
This makes an important point:
modern penile prosthesis MRI safety does not merely permit unrelated MRI scans—it can also make MRI itself useful in diagnosing prosthesis complications.
If you already have a prosthesis and are concerned about malfunction, pain or abnormal positioning, the relevant Andrology Abroad internal resource is the penile prosthesis complications page.
Is MRI Better Than CT for a Penile Implant Problem?
Not always, but MRI has major advantages.
MRI provides excellent soft-tissue contrast.
It can demonstrate:
corporal anatomy;
cylinder positioning;
reservoir configuration;
soft-tissue inflammation;
and several types of mechanical abnormality.
A Mayo Clinic review describes MRI of the full inflatable penile prosthesis system as an excellent modality for evaluating suspected implant complications.
CT can still be valuable, particularly in acute situations.
Ultrasound can also help in selected problems.
The appropriate imaging study depends on the clinical question.
The surgeon and radiologist decide—not the implant patient alone.
Can You Have MRI Immediately After Penile Implant Surgery?
This question is more complicated than:
“Is the implant MR Conditional?”
MR safety classification and postoperative healing are separate issues.
A manufacturer may permit MRI under specified device conditions, while an institution may have additional policies concerning recently implanted passive devices.
The ACR emphasizes that implants must be evaluated according to their specific manufacturer documentation and the MRI facility’s safety procedures.
Therefore, if MRI is needed shortly after penile implant surgery, tell the radiology department:
when the implant was placed;
which device was implanted;
and why the scan is required.
Do not assume you must wait six weeks in every circumstance.
Do not assume you can scan immediately either.
This requires model-specific and institution-specific review.
If MRI is medically urgent, the radiologist and treating physicians can weigh the need for imaging against the relevant device conditions.
What If the MRI Is for an Emergency?
An implanted penile prosthesis should be disclosed immediately.
If the device is modern and documented, verification may be straightforward.
If the model is unknown, the healthcare team may attempt to obtain:
operative records;
implant records;
manufacturer information;
previous imaging;
or other documentation.
The FDA’s general rule remains important:
unknown device MRI status should not simply be assumed safe.
For that reason, keeping your implant details available on your phone as well as your physical card can be valuable—provided medical records are stored securely.
What If You Cannot Find Your Implant Card?
Do not panic.
The card is helpful, but it is not the only possible way to identify the device.
Try the following sources:
The implanting surgeon.
The hospital medical-records department.
Your operative report.
Your discharge summary.
Manufacturer/device labels retained in the medical record.
The clinic that organized your surgery.
The manufacturer once sufficient model information is available.
The key is positive identification.
Do not select a similar-looking implant picture from Google and tell the radiology department:
“I think mine is this one.”
Penile prostheses can look similar externally while containing different materials or components.
Why Medical Travelers Especially Need Their Device Documentation
This issue matters even more for Andrology Abroad patients.
A patient may have surgery in Türkiye and later need MRI in:
Germany;
France;
Italy;
Romania;
the United Kingdom;
Morocco;
Saudi Arabia;
or another country.
The radiology department may have no access to the Turkish hospital record.
The implant card becomes a portable bridge between two healthcare systems.
After penile prosthesis surgery abroad, the patient should ideally leave with documentation stating:
manufacturer;
full device model;
implant date;
surgeon;
hospital;
and manufacturer identification information.
This is useful not only for MRI.
It may also matter for:
future revision;
new urology care;
emergency treatment;
device warranty;
and long-term follow-up.
For the overall surgery pathway, see the penile implant procedure guide.
Rigicon Infla10 MRI Safety
Although the primary search target of this article is AMS 700, many Andrology Abroad readers also consider Rigicon devices.
Rigicon states that the Infla10 Pulse Series is MR Conditional up to 3 Tesla and specifically instructs patients to inform healthcare providers about the implant and carry their Patient Identification Card containing detailed MRI information.
The important wording is again:
MR Conditional.
Not unrestricted MR Safe.
Patients with Infla10 should rely on the current manufacturer/device card for the exact conditions rather than substituting AMS or Coloplast parameters.
Rigicon Rigi10 MRI Safety
Rigi10 is a malleable penile prosthesis.
The U.S. FDA AccessGUDID database records Rigi10 as containing labeling that classifies the device as MR Conditional.
For a formal MRI appointment, the radiology department should still obtain the current model-specific MRI conditions from the device documentation or manufacturer.
This illustrates a broader principle:
knowing that a device is MR Conditional answers only the first question.
The next question is:
“Conditional under what parameters?”
Are Malleable Penile Implants More Dangerous in MRI?
Not as a category.
A malleable device should not automatically be considered more dangerous than an inflatable implant.
Modern malleable prostheses such as Tactra have manufacturer-defined MR Conditional labeling.
Coloplast’s MRI documentation also describes its malleable penile prostheses as MR Conditional under specified parameters.
The problem comes from assuming all devices of the same broad type are identical.
The historical OmniPhase and DuraPhase devices were malleable prostheses with stronger ferromagnetic properties, but they represent old, obsolete technology rather than the expected behavior of modern malleable implants.
So the useful rule is:
model matters more than the word “malleable.”
The Two Old Penile Implants MRI Departments Should Know About
The two names repeatedly identified in radiology literature are:
OmniPhase
and
DuraPhase
from Dacomed.
MRI testing found significant ferromagnetic behavior with these historical devices.
A 2021 RadioGraphics review identifies them as the two penile prostheses incompatible with routine modern MRI guidance.
A newer 2026 review likewise describes the two obsolete implants from the 1980s–1990s as exceptions to the generally favorable MRI status of currently available penile prostheses.
These devices are no longer commercially available.
Therefore, this issue mainly concerns men with very old implants whose model cannot immediately be identified.
It should not frighten a man who received a documented AMS 700, Titan or other modern prosthesis recently.
Can MRI Accidentally Inflate a Penile Implant?
A modern inflatable penile prosthesis uses a mechanical hydraulic pump.
MRI is not supposed to function like someone squeezing that pump.
The purpose of MR Conditional testing is to establish that the device can be exposed to the defined MRI environment without unacceptable hazards.
There is not good evidence that routine MRI causes modern inflatable penile prostheses to suddenly create functional erections.
Historical reports involving ferromagnetic malleable devices are a different issue and should not be extrapolated to modern hydraulic systems.
If unusual device behavior occurs after any medical procedure, the patient should contact his prosthetic urologist.
Can MRI Break a Penile Implant?
Within the tested MR Conditional parameters, manufacturers do not classify MRI as expected to mechanically damage the device.
That is the reason the devices carry MR Conditional labeling.
The MRI team must still follow the specified limits.
A prosthesis that stops functioning after MRI should be evaluated rather than automatically assuming the MRI caused the failure.
Modern prostheses can experience mechanical failure independently over time.
The timing alone does not prove causation.
Can MRI Cause Pain in a Penile Implant?
A correctly documented modern MR Conditional prosthesis should be scanned according to its manufacturer conditions.
If a patient feels:
unusual heat;
pain;
pulling;
or another unexpected sensation during MRI,
he should notify the MRI technologist immediately.
Patients are usually given a communication mechanism during the examination for exactly this reason.
The MRI team can stop the scan and reassess.
This is general MRI safety practice—not evidence that penile implants normally hurt during MRI.
Will the Penile Implant Show Up on MRI?
Yes.
Radiologists can see components of penile prostheses.
Inflatable systems may show:
two cylinders;
scrotal pump;
pelvic reservoir;
and connecting tubing.
MRI characteristics vary according to material and fluid content.
A 2026 radiology review describes the normal appearance of each component in detail and explains how deviations from the normal pattern can reveal complications.
The device appearing on the scan is expected.
That does not mean it is being damaged.
Can MRI Check Whether a Penile Implant Is Broken?
Yes, in selected cases.
MRI can help demonstrate:
fluid leakage;
cylinder fracture;
buckling;
migration;
crossover;
malposition;
erosion;
and reservoir or tubing abnormalities.
A Mayo Clinic study found MRI useful when physical examination was unclear and reported that MRI findings influenced decisions between observation, replacement and salvage procedures.
This can be especially helpful when:
the device feels abnormal;
there is persistent pain;
or the surgeon suspects a positioning problem but examination does not fully explain the complaint.
MRI is not required for every suspected implant problem.
Clinical examination remains central.
What If You Have More Than One Implant?
This is very important.
A man may have:
a penile prosthesis;
hip replacement;
pacemaker;
vascular stent;
surgical clip;
cochlear implant;
or another implanted device.
MRI clearance must consider all implants.
Having an MR Conditional penile prosthesis does not automatically make the complete patient MR Conditional under the same parameters.
For example, a cardiac device may have more restrictive requirements.
The MRI team evaluates the patient as a whole.
That is why the screening form should be completed carefully.
The FDA specifically emphasizes disclosure of implanted devices before MRI.
What If You Have a Pacemaker and a Penile Implant?
The penile implant may be MR Conditional, but the pacemaker has its own conditions.
In this situation, the penile prosthesis is only one part of the MRI safety assessment.
Some modern cardiac systems are also MR Conditional, but they may require:
specific programming;
particular field strengths;
device checks;
and monitoring.
The MRI service and cardiology team determine whether the scan can proceed.
Never assume that approval for your penile prosthesis means automatic approval for another implanted device.
MRI vs Airport Security: These Are Different Questions
Patients sometimes confuse MRI safety with airport scanners.
They are not the same environment.
MRI uses a strong static magnet plus gradient and radiofrequency fields.
Airport security uses different detection technologies.
Coloplast tells Titan patients that the device is suitable for standard airport security and separately describes the implant as MR Conditional.
These should remain separate questions.
Being able to pass through airport security does not prove MRI safety.
And an MR Conditional label does not by itself describe every airport-security technology.
Should You Carry the Implant Card When Traveling?
Yes, it is sensible.
The main reason is medical documentation.
If something happens abroad and a hospital needs to know:
what prosthesis you have;
when it was implanted;
or whether MRI can be performed,
the card can speed identification.
Medical tourists in particular should consider the device record a permanent part of their health documentation.
Your implant may remain in place for many years.
The country in which you eventually require imaging may be completely different from the country in which the operation was performed.
Does a Penile Implant Prevent Prostate MRI?
Not necessarily.
This question is especially relevant because many men receiving penile prostheses have a history of prostate disease.
A modern MR Conditional penile prosthesis does not automatically prevent pelvic MRI.
However, the prosthesis can create artifact near the pelvis and penis.
The radiologist may therefore need to adjust imaging parameters.
The effect on image quality depends on:
the exact device;
the sequences;
and the anatomical target.
The presence of the implant should be communicated before the scan so the radiologist can determine whether MRI remains the best test and how to optimize it.
Does a Penile Implant Prevent Spine or Brain MRI?
Generally, a modern correctly identified MR Conditional penile prosthesis does not automatically prevent these scans.
The implant remains subject to its MRI conditions regardless of which body part is being examined.
But local image artifact from the prosthesis is much less likely to interfere with a brain or cervical-spine image than a scan centered near the pelvis.
The radiology team still needs to know the prosthesis is present.
Distance from the body part being imaged does not eliminate screening requirements.
What Should Be Written in the MRI Referral?
Where possible, the referral or booking information should state something like:
Patient has an implanted penile prosthesis: Boston Scientific AMS 700 [model if known], implanted [date]. Patient has implant identification card/manufacturer MRI documentation available.
For Titan:
Coloplast Titan/Titan Touch penile prosthesis, implanted [date], MR Conditional per manufacturer labeling; implant card available.
The ordering clinician does not need to copy every technical MRI parameter into the referral if the imaging department will verify the current documentation.
What matters most is avoiding the situation in which the patient arrives for the scan and first mentions the implant while standing outside the magnet room.
What Should You Tell the MRI Technologist?
The essential information is simple:
I have a penile implant.
This is the manufacturer.
This is the exact model.
This is when it was implanted.
Here is the implant card.
If you have more than one implanted device, disclose all of them.
If the model is unknown, say that clearly.
Do not reassure the technologist by saying:
“My urologist told me years ago it was MRI safe.”
Let the MRI team verify the current labeling.
A Practical MRI Checklist for Men With Penile Implants
Before the MRI appointment:
Find your implant card.
Confirm manufacturer and model.
Tell the imaging center you have a penile prosthesis before arriving.
Send the implant documentation in advance if requested.
Disclose every other implanted device.
Do not assume “MR Conditional” means unrestricted scanning.
Do not substitute one manufacturer’s MRI conditions for another.
If the device is old or unknown, obtain surgical records if possible.
During the scan, report unexpected heating, pain or pulling immediately.
Keep the device card after the examination—you may need it again years later.
That simple preparation can prevent canceled appointments and unnecessary anxiety.
MRI Status of Common Penile Prostheses
Device | Broad MRI status | Key point |
|---|---|---|
Boston Scientific AMS 700 | MR Conditional | Manufacturer specifies conditions at 1.5T and 3T |
AMS Ambicor | MR Conditional | Included with AMS 700 in current Boston Scientific MRI documentation |
Boston Scientific Tactra | MR Conditional | Model-specific 1.5T and 3T conditions published |
Coloplast Titan / Titan Touch | MR Conditional | Coloplast specifies ≤3T with additional gradient/SAR conditions |
Coloplast modern malleable systems | MR Conditional per applicable manufacturer documentation | Verify exact model and conditions |
Rigicon Infla10 Pulse Series | MR Conditional up to 3T | Carry model-specific Patient Identification Card |
Rigicon Rigi10 | MR Conditional in FDA device labeling database | Verify exact current conditions |
Dacomed OmniPhase | Historical MRI concern / generally avoided | Obsolete ferromagnetic model |
Dacomed DuraPhase | Historical MRI concern / generally avoided | Obsolete ferromagnetic model |
This table is a screening overview—not a replacement for current manufacturer Instructions for Use.
MRI labeling can change as:
models change;
regulatory approvals change;
and manufacturers update documentation.
Always verify the current model-specific information.
Why “MRI Safe Penile Implant” Is Usually the Wrong Search Phrase
Patients naturally search:
“Is my penile implant MRI safe?”
But the technical answer for most modern devices is:
MR Conditional.
That wording matters.
The FDA defines MR Conditional devices as safe only under specified conditions.
So the better search is:
[manufacturer + model] MRI conditions
rather than:
[brand] safe yes or no.
For example:
AMS 700 penile implant MRI safety
is useful because it identifies the actual prosthesis family.
American penile implant MRI
is much less precise.
Why Your Surgeon Should Discuss MRI Documentation Before Discharge
MRI safety may feel irrelevant immediately after penile implant surgery.
The patient is thinking about:
pain;
swelling;
cycling;
and returning to sex.
But device documentation is a long-term issue.
A high-quality implant service should make sure the patient knows:
what was implanted;
where the device information is recorded;
how to replace a lost card where possible;
and that future healthcare teams must be told about the prosthesis.
This is part of long-term prosthetic care.
Not an administrative extra.
If a treatment provider cannot clearly tell you which penile prosthesis was implanted, that is a serious continuity-of-care problem.
What If You Need MRI 15 Years After Implant Surgery?
This is exactly when good documentation matters most.
You may no longer see the original surgeon.
The hospital may have changed ownership.
Your memory may be uncertain.
Yet the device remains inside your body.
If you still have the implant card, the MRI department can start from precise information.
If not, retrieving the operative report becomes important.
Do not infer the device based only on the year of surgery.
Multiple products may have been available during the same period.
What If Your Penile Implant Has Been Revised?
A revision can complicate device identification.
The original card may describe a prosthesis that is no longer entirely present.
A later surgery may have replaced:
the entire device;
the pump;
the cylinders;
or other components.
Your latest operative report and implant record are therefore the most important documents.
When speaking to an MRI department, do not automatically provide only the card from the first implantation if you have since undergone revision.
The current implanted configuration is what matters.
For information on revision itself, Andrology Abroad has a dedicated penile prosthesis revision surgery page.
Can MRI Affect Penile Implant Warranty?
Routine MRI performed in accordance with the manufacturer's MR Conditional instructions should not be treated as an unauthorized activity simply because MRI was used.
However, warranty language differs by manufacturer and market.
If a specific warranty question matters, rely on the written warranty applicable to the implanted device rather than assumptions.
The implant identification information again becomes useful because it allows the manufacturer to identify the system correctly.
Can You Have MRI With a Penile Implant and Contrast Dye?
The penile prosthesis itself and the decision to use an MRI contrast agent are separate issues.
Some MRI examinations use gadolinium-based contrast.
Whether contrast is appropriate depends on the clinical question and patient factors such as kidney function—not primarily on the penile prosthesis.
The radiology team evaluates:
device MRI safety;
and contrast suitability
as separate considerations.
A man can therefore have an MR Conditional implant and still have another medical reason why contrast is not appropriate.
Is CT Safer Than MRI if You Have a Penile Implant?
The question is usually not “which is safer?”
It is:
Which imaging test best answers the medical question?
CT uses ionizing radiation.
MRI does not use ionizing radiation.
MRI has excellent soft-tissue contrast and can be especially useful for evaluating penile prostheses.
CT can be faster and useful in acute settings.
A modern MR Conditional implant does not mean CT should automatically replace MRI.
The clinician and radiologist choose the test based on:
diagnostic need;
device information;
urgency;
and patient factors.
When MRI Is Being Used Specifically to Check the Penile Implant
If MRI is ordered because of a prosthesis problem, tell the radiology department the symptoms and exact implant.
The radiologist may be looking for:
cylinder position;
buckling;
crossover;
reservoir problems;
tubing abnormalities;
erosion;
fluid leakage;
infection;
or surrounding fibrosis.
MRI studies have shown that the findings can directly affect whether a patient is managed with:
observation;
component revision;
prosthesis replacement;
or another surgical strategy.
That is a very different purpose from having a routine brain MRI in a patient who happens to have a penile prosthesis.
Five Common MRI Mistakes Penile Implant Patients Should Avoid
The first mistake is saying only:
“I have a penile implant.”
Provide the model.
The second is saying:
“My implant is MRI safe.”
If it is MR Conditional, use the correct term.
The third is assuming all 3T scanners are automatically acceptable.
Other conditions also matter.
The fourth is losing the implant documentation.
The fifth is forgetting to update your records after revision surgery.
These are avoidable problems.
What the Evidence Does—and Does Not—Show
The evidence provides substantial reassurance.
Published clinical and technical literature indicates that most modern penile prostheses can undergo MRI when manufacturer conditions are followed.
No meaningful pattern of clinical MRI injury has emerged for appropriately managed contemporary devices in the published literature reviewed by Lowe and colleagues.
Modern radiologists routinely use MRI to evaluate penile prostheses themselves.
Manufacturers provide explicit MR Conditional labeling for major contemporary devices such as AMS 700 and Titan.
What the evidence does not support is saying:
“Every penile implant ever manufactured can enter any MRI scanner without checking.”
That is too broad.
Older exceptions exist.
Model-specific restrictions exist.
Unknown devices need identification.
And other implanted devices can impose additional MRI restrictions.
The Bottom Line on AMS 700 Penile Implant MRI Safety
AMS 700 penile implant MRI safety is well documented: Boston Scientific classifies the AMS 700 product line as MR Conditional at both 1.5T and 3T when specified MRI conditions are followed.
For AMS 700 and AMS Ambicor, current manufacturer documentation includes defined limits for:
magnetic field strength;
spatial gradient;
whole-body averaged SAR;
and scanning duration.
This means an AMS 700 generally should not prevent a medically necessary MRI.
But the correct statement is:
MR Conditional
rather than:
universally MRI safe.
Coloplast Titan follows the same general principle.
Titan and Titan Touch are classified as MR Conditional. Coloplast documentation supports scanning at static field strengths up to 3T when the stated gradient and SAR conditions are respected.
Rigicon likewise identifies modern Infla10 systems as MR Conditional up to 3T, while the FDA device database records Rigi10 as MR Conditional.
For most contemporary penile prosthesis patients, therefore, the answer to:
“Can I ever have MRI again?”
is reassuringly:
Yes, usually.
But there are three rules that should never be skipped.
First, identify the exact implant.
Second, give the implant card or manufacturer information to the MRI department.
Third, let trained MRI personnel confirm that the scanner and protocol satisfy the manufacturer's conditions.
This becomes especially important in men with older or unknown implants.
Historical OmniPhase and DuraPhase prostheses are the major exceptions repeatedly identified in the MRI literature because of their ferromagnetic characteristics. They are obsolete, but they are one reason an unknown old penile implant should never be assumed safe solely because modern implants usually are.
The FDA's advice is clear: an implanted medical device should be positively identified as MR Safe or MR Conditional before scanning, and the conditions for MR Conditional devices must be followed.
For patients, that means the most important MRI accessory is not a special shield or cover.
It is documentation.
Keep your implant card.
Save your operative information.
Know your manufacturer.
Know your device.
And tell the radiology department before the day of the scan.
If you are considering implantation and want to understand the operation itself, see the penile implant procedure guide.
If you already have a device and MRI is being considered because of pain, abnormal positioning or possible mechanical failure, review penile prosthesis complications.
If a prosthesis may need replacement, see penile prosthesis revision surgery.
For current treatment pricing in Türkiye, use penile implant surgery cost in Turkey.
And if you need help confirming which implant is being proposed before surgery, contact Andrology Abroad.
The most useful sentence to remember is:
Having a modern penile implant usually does not exclude MRI—but the exact device must be identified and its MR Conditional rules followed.
Common questions
Can you have an MRI with an AMS 700 penile implant?
Is an AMS 700 penile implant MRI safe at 3 Tesla?
Is a Coloplast Titan penile implant MRI safe?
What does MR Conditional mean for a penile implant?
Do I need my penile implant card for an MRI?
What if I lost my penile implant card?
Can an MRI damage or inflate a penile implant?
Are malleable penile implants safe for MRI?
Can MRI be used to check a penile implant complication?
Can I have a brain or spine MRI if I have a penile implant?
Sources
- Boston Scientific — MRI Important Safety Information: AMS 700™, AMS Ambicor™, Spectra™ and Tactra™ Penile Prostheses
- Coloplast — MRI Compatibility and Latex Content Memo: Penile Prostheses
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration — Benefits and Risks of MRI
- American College of Radiology — Manual on MR Safety
- Lowe G, Smith RP, Costabile RA. A catalog of magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of penile prostheses. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2012;9(5):1482–1487.
- Verde F, Iossa V, Camillo C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of penile prostheses: A pictorial review of normal appearances and complications. European Journal of Radiology. 2026;195:112625.
- MRI of Penile Prostheses: The Challenge of Diagnosing Postsurgical Complications. RadioGraphics. 2021.
- McPhail EF, Nehra A, Bruner BC, et al. MRI and its role in the evaluation and surgical decision making in patients with challenging IPP presentations. BJU International. 2012.
- Rigicon — Infla10® Pulse™ Penile Implant Device Support
- U.S. National Library of Medicine AccessGUDID — RIGI10 Device Record
Last reviewed 21 September 2026. We re-review this article by 31 January 2027. This article is for information and is not a substitute for advice from a doctor who knows your history.
